Independent consulting · Cole Lyons
A defined question. Evidence you can use.
I help healthcare operations teams, independent consultants, and implementation partners work out what their reports actually support and what to do next.
An informed assessment
Healthcare Metrics & Workflow Review
$500
Bring one reporting question or workflow concern. I review the agreed materials, work through the problem with you in a working session, and provide a short written assessment of discrepancies, missing evidence, and recommended next steps.
Review scope and deliverables →The analysis performed
Healthcare Analytics Sprint
From $1,500
One operational question, up to two agreed exports, one observation period, and one revision, subject to an input-feasibility check. You receive a reconciled analysis, a usable workbook, and an explanation of the findings and limitations for leadership.
Sprint scope and deliverables →Review · $500 USD
Understand the problem before commissioning the fix.
“Our dashboard shows that scheduling improved, but the operations team disagrees. Can you help us determine what the report actually measures?”
We agree on one question and the specific reports, metric definitions, or workflow description to review before work begins. The review includes one working session of up to 60 minutes and a short written assessment: what is supported, what remains uncertain, and the next checks worth making.
The review may conclude that additional data is needed. It does not include rebuilding data pipelines, performing a full analysis of raw exports, production implementation, a comprehensive security assessment, or ongoing advisory access.
Discuss a focused review →Sprint · from $1,500 USD
Resolve one operational question.
- Why do these two reports disagree?
- Did this workflow change improve the measure we care about?
- What is hiding inside this unclear category?
The initial scope covers one question, up to two agreed exports, one observation period, and one consolidated revision. Before quoting, I check whether the available fields, definitions, format, volume, and join keys can support the question. We agree on appropriate handling before any transfer.
You receive a reconciled analysis, a workbook with definitions and traceable calculations, and a decision memo explaining the findings, limitations, and recommended next steps.
The written proposal fixes the price, inputs, delivery date, and acceptance criteria. New sources, additional periods, new questions, recurring refreshes, or production integrations require a separate scope. Missing inputs can change feasibility or timing; they do not silently expand the engagement.
Discuss an analytics sprint →How we begin
Describe the decision, systems involved, and deadline. I review the inquiry for fit and suggest a scoping conversation or written proposal where useful. Work begins after scope and terms are agreed.
Please leave patient information, credentials, confidential employer material, and private records out of the initial message. These engagements support operational analysis; they do not provide clinical advice or establish a causal result by default.
Public-data research
I also consider bounded healthcare-market and public-source research questions through the same inquiry route. The first question is whether the available sources can support your decision.
Read the independent research case or describe a research decision. For specialist agent-workflow assurance, visit Access Red Team. For AJHCS sponsorship, contact AJHCS directly.